AFFORDABLE HOUSING · LIVE NOW · RUN YOUR OWN DEAL
Affordable housing is where Skumu starts, and it is live today. Below is a real $47.6 million Los Angeles application — we gave Skumu the deal and the rules, not the result. When you have seen what it did, open the live product and run your own California affordable-housing deal through it. No slides, no mockup. The real thing, today.
THE ARC · ONE DEAL, TWO STATES
Sherman Way · $47.6M · 31 requirements · 9 evidence items
Day one: NO GO — not this cycle
Three threshold items blocking it cold — each routed to the firm that owns it.
Developer CTCAC 9% allocation letter — outstanding
−4.650 points to the agency review
Counsel Closing conditions — 0 of 9 on file
9 to track · 0 of 9 on file
Public affairs Letter of Support · Council District 3
Securing on the record
This deal's state is on the record · CA-24-044 · every entry traces to source
Same deal. What changed was not the paperwork. It was knowing, on day one, exactly what stood between the deal and the money.
LIVE · CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING
If you are a developer, counsel, consultant or public-affairs firm working a California affordable-housing deal, Skumu can run it today — against the live rules, before you spend the next dollar. Affordable housing is where we start. It is not where we stop, but it is what is live right now, and you can put a real deal into it this week.
PROOF BEFORE ANSWER · REPRODUCED TO THE DECIMAL
On a real filed deal, Skumu recomputed the tie-breaker from the source inputs and reproduced the applicant's self-score exactly — a miss of 0.000 — the proof the engine runs the agency's rules rather than guessing at them. The agency's own review later published a final 4.650 points lower, and rather than bury that gap or explain it away, the record shows every point where the two figures part ways, each traced to the rule and the source behind it. Use any AI model you like. It cannot produce this screen, because it has no engine to run the rules and no record to check itself against. When the record cannot support the math, Skumu does not guess. It declines until the evidence is there.
No proof = no claim. AI suggests. Humans decide.
ONE RECORD · THREE RESPONSIBILITIES
The developer sees the verdict and what it costs to continue. Legal sees the governing obligation, the source and the unresolved exposure. Public affairs sees the stakeholders and the outreach that can still move the outcome. Each firm sees only what it owns, and all of them work from the same answer instead of four versions in four inboxes.
Sherman Way · $47.6M · 31 requirements · 9 evidence items
The operator sees readiness and the cost of continuing.
Self-score final 73.468%
Applicant §10325(c)(9) · reproduced by Skumu
Agency-review delta −4.650 points
CTCAC staff report CA-24-044, p.4
Next move Upload the CTCAC 9% allocation letter
Outstanding in our records · finance
This seat's work is on the record · CA-24-044 · every entry traces to source
Each seat sees only the controls it can use, proven with real logged-in sessions, and each carries its own piece of the liability if something is missed. That shared record is more than a workflow. It is every professional's proof they did their job — what was reviewed, what was found and who owns what is left — an accountability trail that can't be quietly rewritten.
And it compounds past the deal. Every deal is multiple paid seats instead of one, and every firm that runs one matter through Skumu carries it into the next client's deal. That is how it crosses the market — professional to professional, portfolio to portfolio.
THE ASK
You have seen the machine reproduce the state's own score on a real deal. The next one it runs can be yours. If you are working a California affordable-housing deal, open the live sandbox, sign up and load it — you will know where it stands before you spend the next dollar. This is live right now. It is where we start, and we are looking for the developers, attorneys, consultants and public-affairs firms who want to start with us.
Skumu is live at app.skumu.ai